Material Considerations

🗂 Devlog #4 — Report Templates: Building the Narrative Spine

Drafting planning reports with structure, not style guides.


💡 Overview

Even the best AI reasoning is useless if it can’t land in a format planners actually use. That’s what the report template system is for: turning structured reasoning into editable officer report drafts, tailored by application type and designed to be recognisable, complete, and professional.

This devlog outlines how I’ve built a modular, policy-aware, planner-grade reporting engine — not to automate final decisions, but to produce strong first drafts that officers can review, adapt, and own.


🧱 What These Templates Are (and Aren’t)

Each report template acts as a structured scaffold — not a static PDF, not a blank text box. They encode:

These aren’t full automation tools. They’re designed for co-authorship — AI generates the bones, planners do the final sculpting.


📋 Coverage So Far

As of now, templates are implemented for over 20 real-world application types, including:

🏘 Core Applications

🧾 Certificates & Amendments

🏛 Heritage, Trees & Other Consents

📦 Prior Approvals (GPDO)

Each template is modular: it knows which reasoning cards to expect, which sections to show or hide, and how to flow from assessment to recommendation. Everything’s traceable and editable.


🚧 Still To Come

A few important types are still queued up:


🧩 Template Mechanics in Practice

This system is more than a document generator — it's a structured interface between the AI's internal reasoning graph and the officer's narrative expectations. Each template serves three key roles:

This design allows AI outputs to align with human workflows without needing to reinvent formatting, logic, or expectation structures each time.


🔄 Next Steps


✍️ Closing Note

These templates aren’t about generating the final word. They’re about helping officers start with something solid — a draft rooted in the right structure, law, and reasoning. One they can revise, annotate, and stand behind.

“The goal isn’t to replace the officer — it’s to hand them a draft that feels like they already wrote it.”